Bush Walks and Talks Softly -- Where's the Big Stick?

Unlike his predeccessor, Theodore Roosevelt, President George W. Bush has not fought hard enough against corporate wrongdoing. The Republicans often claim the mantle of TR, but on this issue, Bush has failed to do little more than manipulate public opinion.

In the early years of the twentieth century, businesses in the United States were transformed into "big business" as a tidal wave of thousands of companies were merged into large trusts that sought to squelch competition. For instance, the nation's first billion dollar corporation, United States Steel, brought together by financier J.P. Morgan, was a conglomeration of 213 manufacturing companies, including 41 mines, and owned more than 1,000 miles of railroad track and 112 ore ships. As a result, U.S. Steel accounted for 60 percent of the nation's steelmaking output and 43 percent of its pig iron capacity.
In response to this threat, President Theodore Roosevelt responded by waging a very public battle with Corporate America, which had been used to more gentlemanly, behind-the-scenes negotiations between business and government. In 1901, he told Congress that "tremendous and highly complex industrial development" among businesses led to "very serious social problems." In his mind, "The old laws, and the old customs which had almost the binding force of law, were once quite sufficient to regulate the accumulation and distribution of wealth. Since the industrial changes which have so enormously increased the productive power of mankind, they are no longer sufficient."

Sensing the public's anxiety, Roosevelt used his political power to take down several of the most powerful trusts and push through government regulations, unprecedented at the time. In 1902, Roosevelt went after Northern Securities, a railroad trust controlled by Morgan, labeling the financier and those like him, "malefactors of great wealth."

Roosevelt's fight with big business expanded and redefined the power of the presidency, underscoring the government's right to regulate corporations through the establishment of federal agencies and direct intervention. By publicly taking on the responsibility for fighting trusts, Roosevelt also redefined how an activist president could make a difference.

A century later, the United States faces an even greater financial challenge--the loss of faith in big business--as a slew of corporations have either admitted to or are fighting charges of economic wrongdoing. Even worse, the ones left holding the bag have been small investors, who believed the misguided economic numbers delivered by duplicitous executives, and employees of these companies, who have been laid off numbering in the tens of thousands.

Rather than take up the mantle of Roosevelt, which the Republican Party has claimed over the last 100 years, President George W. Bush delivers speech after speech filled with weak jabs and vague proposals, geared more toward public opinion polls than real policymaking, even playing the September 11 card in his initial remarks, claiming, "People of this city are writing one of the greatest chapters in our nation's history, and all Americans are proud of New York." Later, he linked the war on terrorism with the fight for corporate responsibility.

Listing typical positives, including U.S. technology prowess and military power, Bush declared, "The American economy is the most creative and enterprising and productive system ever devised." He did not note, however, that in recent times the vaunted creativity of American capitalism has been used to dupe the system and the public.